Include diverse perspectives in AI risk decisions
AIR-04955B1030 · version 2 · Fairness · candidate interpretation
AI governance owners should include diverse perspectives in AI risk decisions.
Situation & purpose
An AI system or employee activity involves diverse perspectives in AI risk decisions. Confirm the actor and source conditions before using this template.
Provide a traceable control for the action: include diverse perspectives in AI risk decisions.
Examples
- Meets the rule
- AI governance owners follows the recommendation to "include" for diverse perspectives in AI risk decisions within these conditions: AI lifecycle and deployment context; voluntary framework outcome.
- Does not meet the rule
- AI governance owners omits the recommended action "include" for diverse perspectives in AI risk decisions. This is a recommendation gap, not by itself a statutory violation.
- Outside scope
- The actor, activity, jurisdiction, or applicability conditions in this source variant do not match.
Evidence & enforcement
- Dated record of the action
- Responsible actor and approval, where required
- Applicable source edition and scope
Human or authorized system adapter required. Machine-executable: no. Convert to a reviewed organization contract and validate the adapter before deployment.
Limits
A rule card is an interpretation aid, not an applicability determination.
Equivalent intent does not make different source obligations interchangeable.
Owner review
Record your interpretation decision. This does not adopt a policy for an organization.
JSON rule card
{
"id": "AIR-04955B1030",
"version": 2,
"title": "Include diverse perspectives in AI risk decisions",
"text": "AI governance owners should include diverse perspectives in AI risk decisions.",
"topic": "Fairness",
"intent": "include diverse perspectives in ai risk decisions",
"status": "candidate",
"semanticStatus": "human-validation-required",
"variants": [
{
"sourceId": "nist-ai-rmf-1",
"control": "Govern 3.1",
"sourceVersion": "AI RMF 1.0 (2023)",
"url": "https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/nist.ai.100-1.pdf",
"actor": "AI governance owners",
"modality": "should",
"action": "include",
"object": "diverse perspectives in AI risk decisions",
"condition": "AI lifecycle and deployment context; voluntary framework outcome",
"exception": null,
"timing": null,
"authority": "voluntary",
"jurisdiction": "United States",
"checkedAt": "2026-10-03",
"status": "interpretation-needs-review",
"examples": {
"meetsRule": "AI governance owners follows the recommendation to \"include\" for diverse perspectives in AI risk decisions within these conditions: AI lifecycle and deployment context; voluntary framework outcome.",
"doesNotMeetRule": "AI governance owners omits the recommended action \"include\" for diverse perspectives in AI risk decisions. This is a recommendation gap, not by itself a statutory violation.",
"outOfScope": "The actor, activity, jurisdiction, or applicability conditions in this source variant do not match."
}
}
],
"situation": "An AI system or employee activity involves diverse perspectives in AI risk decisions. Confirm the actor and source conditions before using this template.",
"purpose": "Provide a traceable control for the action: include diverse perspectives in AI risk decisions.",
"examples": {
"meetsRule": "AI governance owners follows the recommendation to \"include\" for diverse perspectives in AI risk decisions within these conditions: AI lifecycle and deployment context; voluntary framework outcome.",
"doesNotMeetRule": "AI governance owners omits the recommended action \"include\" for diverse perspectives in AI risk decisions. This is a recommendation gap, not by itself a statutory violation.",
"outOfScope": "The actor, activity, jurisdiction, or applicability conditions in this source variant do not match."
},
"evidence": [
"Dated record of the action",
"Responsible actor and approval, where required",
"Applicable source edition and scope"
],
"enforcement": {
"mode": "policy-template",
"adapter": "Human or authorized system adapter required",
"machineExecutable": false
},
"limitations": [
"A rule card is an interpretation aid, not an applicability determination.",
"Equivalent intent does not make different source obligations interchangeable."
],
"createdAt": "2026-10-03",
"updatedAt": "2026-10-03"
}